Economy Alliances

Archive for the ‘industrial engineering’ Category

The sources of cost advantage are varied and depend on the industry structure. May include preferential access to raw materials, proprietary technology, the pursuit of economies of scale and others.

Companies that work with low cost typically sell a standard, or product / service without ornaments and placed considerable emphasis on the scale of maturity. If a company manages and maintains the overall cost leadership will be an above average performer in a sector as long as their prices are at or near the average for that sector. At equivalent or lower prices of rivals this position translates into higher returns, but this leadership can not ignore the bases of differentiation. If a product is not perceived as comparable or acceptable to buyers, a cost leader will be forced to discount prices well below their competitors to make sales.

The strategic logic of cost leadership usually requires that a company is the leader in costs, and not one of several companies fighting for this position. When more than one aspiring cost leader, rivalry is usually hard for every point of market share is considered crucial. Unless a company can achieve cost leadership and persuade others to abandon their strategies, the utility consequences can be disastrous.

Differentiation

In a differentiation strategy, a company seeks to be unique in an industry with some qualities widely valued by buyers. Select one or more attributes that many buyers perceive as important and exclusive places to meet those needs. The rewards of its uniqueness is a higher price.
The sources for differentiation are particular to each sector. It can be based on the product or service itself, the delivery system through which it is sold, the marketing approach and a wide range of other factors.
A company can achieve and sustain differentiation will be an above average performer in the sector, if the price premium exceeds the extra costs incurred to be unique. A differentiators can not ignore its cost position because the higher price would be offset by a competitor with a markedly inferior cost position. So try to close as a differentiators from its competitors costs, reducing all other areas that do not affect differentiation.

A company must be truly unique or perceived as something only if you want a higher price. In contrast to cost leadership may be more than one successful differentiation strategy in a sector if there are several attributes that are widely valued by buyers.

APPROACH

This strategy is very different from the others because it relies on the choice of a narrow view of competition within an industry. The “focused” select a group or segment and adjust its strategy to serve them to the exclusion of others. By optimizing its strategy for the target segments, it seeks to gain a competitive edge in its segment but does not have an overall competitive advantage.

The focus strategy has two variants: cost focus and differentiation focus.

Read the rest of this entry »

The time spent by a consumer interacting with an online ad is the best indicator of its profits under the criteria for measuring the affinity with the brand in digital media.

There is a close relationship between the time a person invests active in interacting with the advertising and the impact such advertising has on brand and the subsequent incorporation of the person as a consumer.

Searches for terms containing the brand, site visits where we talk about the brand and number of pages on these sites mean an increase in the level of commitment of a person with the brand.

This suggests that achieving information or advertising where people spend more time interacting means a successful marketing campaigns.

Measuring only the number of clicks that an ad does not mean effectiveness is important to measure the time spent.

According to data published by Eye blaster added in July 2009, consumers have a 25 times higher inclination to spend a long time (an average of 53 seconds) with a rich media ad (ads that move, pop-ups or animated formats Macromedia Flash).

The move to this new facility is due to high growth and development of our company in the Spanish market.” “For that reason,” added Jon Anderson have chosen the San Fernando Business Park as the new location of the offices of sales and marketing department of Continental Tires for Spain in Madrid. In these new facilities will continue to develop and enhance our business by providing our employees, partners and customers in a modern working environment, adapted to the latest and most modern technologies, transparent, flexible and with more and better services. “

The Goodman Group has also developed for Continental Tires, logistics distribution center in Korbach (Germany). It also deals with the management of this and another facility that the company owns in the city Germanic, which runs through the Goodman European Logistics Fund (Golf).

For his part, William Ravel, country manager of Goodman in Spain indicates that “this agreement with Continental Tires Spain shows the importance they give our customers the excellent location of our parks, and our integrated customer service. The trust has Continental Tires Goodman deposited in a long term contract confirms our business model is highly valued by our customers and reaffirms our efforts to improve”

The owner of the Commercial Court No. 1 of Bilbo has completely rejected the claim that ACS filed against the rejection of Bedroll to access your board, despite being the largest shareholder of the electric current with a share of 20.2 %.

The judge is justified the dismissal of the director who proposed ACS for Bedroll, noting “risks” because both companies “competing” in renewable energy and industrial engineering and have interests in other areas such as the electric car.

In his opinion, none of the grounds of appeal raised by ACS “justifies” the cancellation of the two agreements of the last meeting of shareholders of the power in March 2010, challenged by the builder, corresponding to the removal of director he had appointed and the reduction to fourteen the number of members of the board of directors of Bedroll.

The ruling was issued nearly a year after the start of the legal dispute between the two companies. Today, another lawsuit is pending that face; the challenge for Bedroll presented in a Commercial Court of Madrid against ACS and accounts that resulted in another trial on the indirect participation of the construction through Matrixes.

In addition, the sentencing judge Bilbo days after the Supreme Court rejected the request of Bedroll to suspend the obligation to remove shields in listed companies, including the reform of the Audit Law and Corporations and shall enter into force on July 1, until the appeal is that the electric filed against this new standard.